<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Growing with Twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://brain-vibe.com/2009/10/18/growing-with-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://brain-vibe.com/2009/10/18/growing-with-twitter/</link>
	<description>marketing muses to stay engaged</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mgoetz</title>
		<link>http://brain-vibe.com/2009/10/18/growing-with-twitter/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mgoetz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brain-vibe.com/?p=494#comment-297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Shel:
I wish there were things that could convince spammers that what they do is not worth it.  The only issue is that they do get something out of it - people do buy in.  Especially now with high unemployment and people losing their homes some think there are ways to make easy money.  I&#039;d thought of putting out the names of those that were in my follower list and decided against it.  I&#039;d rather not give them the fame.  It feeds into their tactic.  I also think that contacting them may not work either as I think they send but don&#039;t watch what comes back to them.  In the end, I don&#039;t want the association and try to keep it out of my tweets and follower list.  Sorry state - thus the rant.

I hope what you do works.  I&#039;m certainly with you in my disdain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shel:<br />
I wish there were things that could convince spammers that what they do is not worth it.  The only issue is that they do get something out of it &#8211; people do buy in.  Especially now with high unemployment and people losing their homes some think there are ways to make easy money.  I&#8217;d thought of putting out the names of those that were in my follower list and decided against it.  I&#8217;d rather not give them the fame.  It feeds into their tactic.  I also think that contacting them may not work either as I think they send but don&#8217;t watch what comes back to them.  In the end, I don&#8217;t want the association and try to keep it out of my tweets and follower list.  Sorry state &#8211; thus the rant.</p>
<p>I hope what you do works.  I&#8217;m certainly with you in my disdain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shel Horowitz - Ethical/Green Marketing Expert</title>
		<link>http://brain-vibe.com/2009/10/18/growing-with-twitter/#comment-296</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shel Horowitz - Ethical/Green Marketing Expert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brain-vibe.com/?p=494#comment-296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right you are! I use TweetDeck&#039;s block-and-report tool, but first, while they can still receive my tweets, I do two things:

1. I visit their profile to make sure they weren&#039;t the victim of a hijack (several times, you see a pattern of great tweets supplanted at the top by junk)--if they have, I warn them to change logons and delete the junk.

2. If they&#039;re a genuine spammer (can spammers EVER be genuine?), I send a tweet like &quot;@idiot I block and report spammers. Bye!&quot; - so others can proactively block them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right you are! I use TweetDeck&#8217;s block-and-report tool, but first, while they can still receive my tweets, I do two things:</p>
<p>1. I visit their profile to make sure they weren&#8217;t the victim of a hijack (several times, you see a pattern of great tweets supplanted at the top by junk)&#8211;if they have, I warn them to change logons and delete the junk.</p>
<p>2. If they&#8217;re a genuine spammer (can spammers EVER be genuine?), I send a tweet like &#8220;@idiot I block and report spammers. Bye!&#8221; &#8211; so others can proactively block them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

